Filed Under Community | Comments Off
by Susan M. Jennings & Rose Hardesty
Community Solutions is pleased to announce that we have been selected to receive a 2015 AmeriCorps VISTA volunteer to assist us with outreach to the low-income community in Ohio and nationally. Much of our recent research work has been focused on energy conservation as a way to reduce carbon emissions. While our constituency is primarily motivated by environmental concerns, the energy conservation work that we have accomplished has broad applicability. To extend our outreach, we are developing energy efficiency materials in print, web, and workshop format for constituencies who are motivated by other concerns, including the financial burdens of home energy use.
We are seeking a passionate and committed individual to serve with us full-time for a year beginning in June, as part of the AmeriCorps national anti-poverty program. The VISTA member will help us develop our Energy Navigators Project, bringing together the energy expertise of Community Solutions and our partners with the outreach capabilities of Yellow Springs Home, Inc. and Opportunities for Individual Change in Springfield to develop a coordinated energy literacy campaign for the low-income citizens of Yellow Springs and Springfield. The pilot materials developed—in print, web, video, and workshop format—will later be shared broadly with Community Action Partnership (CAP) agencies throughout Ohio and the Nation. The VISTA volunteer will work with community and energy partners to develop materials, disseminate them, revise them, and assist in their inclusion in the resources and workplan of the partners moving forward.
While energy and water use and costs impact all householders, low-income renters and homeowners are particularly affected. They often do not have the resources to accomplish deep-energy retrofits, and renters are dependent on landlords to do upgrades. Even with financial incentives, the aging stock of homes in the Yellow Springs/Springfield area means that weatherization projects are expensive and often cannot be accomplished because of pre-existing home barriers. This means that low-income residents, whose energy bills represent a significantly higher portion of their income than those of median-income householders, often are—literally—left out in the cold. Utilities-related debt, shut-offs, inefficient heating systems, antiquated appliances, and extreme home temperatures have significant health impacts, including respiratory illness, pneumonia, increased fire risk, bronchitis, hunger, and stress. These health and safety issues can lead to additional expenses and loss of income for poor families.
Fortunately, there are many no- and low-cost strategies for energy and water reduction. Low-cost strategies for energy savings include covering windows with plastic sheeting for increased insulation, caulking building leaks to prevent escaping heat, and switching to energy-efficient lightbulbs. No-cost behavioral changes include turning down thermostats, using cold water rather than hot taps for many household uses, closing off rooms in the winter, unplugging what is not in use, pulling shades or otherwise covering windows, turning down heat at night, turning the lights off when you leave the room, tapping natural resources (south-facing windows, natural ventilation), wearing layers indoors, and heating people rather than space.
Energy literacy also includes the ability to read utility bills; awareness of programs and other assets that are available to low-income residents in need of emergency energy assistance; and empowering low-income communities to conduct basic energy audits to assess their own energy use and needs. The project will also emphasize community action and leadership, which can provide a support network to prevent individuals from falling into crisis.
If you or someone you know is interested in this exciting position, you can find the job description and application on the AmeriCorps website, or contact Susan Jennings: email@example.com, (937) 767-2161.
by Pat Murphy
Mario Alberto Arrastia Avila left this morning from my home at about 4 AM to catch a plane to Miami where he would stay for a few days visiting friends and then return home to Cuba. Originally he was to give a talk at our November 7–9, 2014 conference, “Climate Crisis Solutions: Curtailment and Community.” All the speakers and panelists could, without doubt, be labeled curtailers.
Curtailers are different from consumers or conservers, consumers being those who are blithely devouring and polluting the planet and conservers being those who want to pull back a bit but avoid making big changes in the way they live. Curtailers are those who are concerned with the survival of the human race and other life forms on the earth. They view the climate crisis as the most significant and dangerous event that has happened in the history of the earth. There have been extinctions of species before, occurring some millions of years ago. Some people may have been concerned about extinction in the future, but they typically think about eons ahead. Curtailers have a much shorter time frame. They used to worry about their grandchildren, then their children and now they think about their own longevity.
Being a curtailer in America is not a popular occupation or avocation. The very use of the word in ordinary conversation typically elicits a response that is one of shock or a low level of hostility. Many people have suggested I find another word, pointing out that curtail might be a bit harsh. Some suggest cut back, which is a popular synonym for curtail, but cut back lacks a noun form. One can advocate for curtailment but not for “cutbackment”. There are a few people who have a positive response when they hear the word, a response that has the quality of a sudden insight, what we often refer to as the light bulb turning on. These people seem to be our audience and most of my conversations with them are about how much we have to curtail, or what rate of curtailment is needed, but mostly a discussion of methods.
Talking with Mario was the kind of talk two people have who are on the same path and have been on it for some time. Mario had read my book Plan C, and I had read many of his papers. Much of his written work, his books and papers, were brought from Cuba by my wife, Faith, when she visited there in late 2011. Faith met Mario and told me a lot about him so it was my great pleasure to make this initial face to face contact. We were primed to meet and from the time he arrived we spent hours each day talking. There was a lot of my recent work that interested him, particular the work on the life cycle assessment of food, and I showed him my data. I was eager to learn about recent events in Cuba in the area of energy. Only the day before Mario left Cuba, President Obama announced his establishment of official relations with Cuba, an event that gladdened my heart. Neither Mario nor I expected some great breakthrough and spent little time on the topic. Rather we focused on energy issues and how Cuba was doing in terms of its objectives. I had prepared a long article in partnership with my wife Faith Morgan which was published in the 2013 issue of Worldwatch’s annual State of the World Report. The 2013 Report was entitled “Is Sustainability Still Possible?” and our article on Cuba entitled was entitled Cuba: Lessons from a Forced Decline.
This Worldwatch Report is described as opening with “experts defining clear sustainability metrics and examining various policies and perspectives that could put us on the path to prosperity without diminishing the well-being of future generations.” It then notes that “…If these approaches fall short, the final chapters explore ways to prepare for drastic environmental change and resource depletion…” Our article on Cuba was in that third section which was entitled “Open in Case of Emergency.” We closed the article with a final section titled “The Cuba Paradigm,” saying:
“Cuba has a very low per capita income, yet in the non-materialistic, quality-of-life domain, it excels. Thus, Cuba represents a paradox. It is a materially poor country that has First World education, literacy, and healthcare. It is rich in human development resources and low in environmental burdens, but its standard of living, and therefore its fossil fuel use and CO2 emissions are very low. Cuba has maintained its human-service programs (education, old-age support, basic nutrition, and health care) throughout its Special Period. In 2006, Cuba was the only country in the world rated as having “sustainable development” in World Wildlife Fund’s “Living Planet Report.”
Fidel Castro has said that “consumer-based societies are incompatible with the saving of natural resources and energy, which the development and preservation of our species require,” and Cubans simply have less of all material goods than people in developed countries. They have much less square footage in their homes (about 150 – 200 square feet per person in Havana versus the U.S. average of about 1,000 square feet per person). Fewer than 10 percent of Cubans have private cars. They rarely fly. The consumption of common consumer personal goods is very limited. Yet Cubans don’t need to fear cancelled medical insurance. They know their children will be educated without being saddled with student loans. Cubans are not weighed down with enormous debts. They know they will not go hungry or homeless.
“We need a global energy revolution,” Mario had said earlier, “But in order for this to happen, we also need a revolution in consciousness.” A clear revolution of consciousness would involve the acknowledgement, strongly resisted by richer nations, that CO2 emissions are directly related to material consumption. Cuba represents an alternative, where material success as measured by energy consumption is secondary while other quality-of-life issues are given priority. The message from Cuba is that humanity will survive if it adopts the Cuban material standard of living, and thrive if it adopts the Cuban priorities of providing health care, education, and basic food for everyone.
We have long been aware of Mario’s work so his presentation here in Yellow Springs the evening of Martin Luther King Day was not new to us but more of an update. That’s not to say that the updates are not major — Cuba’s commitment to solar PVs is amazing. This is clear from Mario’s presentation which can be downloaded on Vimeo at [link]. But the important thing that came up in our time together starts with his statement quoted above which says “But in order for this to happen (a global energy revolution) we also need a revolution in consciousness.” My meeting with him this trip and particularly our final conversation was to talk about a revolution in consciousness.
I am never quite clear what the word consciousness means in terms of humans. It seems to be some kind of awareness. Maybe it could be construed as a different set of values. Or it could mean a radical change to a culture, as happened to Cuba. Cuba made major changes to its society when faced with the threat of starvation and even survival as a people. The Special Period in Cuba (discussed in detail in our Worldwatch article) was to some extent a type of trial that countries go through who have lost a war. And Cuba’s survival is still in question as the American blockade (Cuba’s term for the U.S. embargo) continues. But today Cuba’s survival is not so much what the U.S. does to it directly but rather what the U.S. and other industrialized nations are doing to the planet. If the U.S. lifts the blockade against Cuba, but continues to put 18 metric tons of CO2 per capita into the atmosphere every year, we are severely jeopardizing Cuba and other island nations. If the blockade is lifted but the sea level rises and fresh water becomes limited for Cubans, or if climate change turns their section of the biosphere into a tropical desert, we all lose.
Sometime after Mario and I went to bed, I considered what my lifestyle was doing to his lifestyle. Politically we have similar views and technically we share a scientific background and we both believe in the importance of curtailment. But my driving a Prius is very different from Mario’s lack of a car, with no desire or opportunity to ever own one, and his frequent hour’s wait for the next bus. My 2000-square-foot house with its thick walls and good insulation and mini-split heat pump is very different from Mario’s 400-500-square-foot, one-room apartment with a few fans at best to ward off the Cuban summer heat. My diet is rich and varied compared to his. And although I am a vegetarian, I could afford meat should I decide to change, while a Cuban’s chances of an American meat diet are small, since meat is very expensive. I am well below the average American’s 17.4 metric tons of CO2 generated annually but I am far away from the 2.4 metric tons Mario generates each year.
At the conference in November, I presented a new approach to the problem by proposing a Curtailer’s Emissions Guide, a way to develop a CO2 budget for our personal emissions. It’s a way to deeply understand our effect and to see the CO2 created for all of our activities. It’s not abstract like an environmental footprint, but can be a practical methodology for making personal change. My hope is to provide different levels of curtailment tactics for each classification of CO2, the big ones being housing, cars, and food, and the 20 or so subcategories being a breakdown like a family budget. I realized after talking with Mario that it could also be quite useful for him. Doing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of food was new to him, and I think he will take some of the food LCA papers I gave him and apply it in Cuba. But will it be useful without the personal and political will to make a fundamental change in the way I live? Mario made many of his choices because of the blockade – deep reductions were forced on all Cubans. I must make similar choices from some other motivation. I hesitate to even begin to describe that motivation; words stick in my throat as I try to express them. In modern America to speak of shame for my way of living that has been so damaging will have me driven from polite conversation. I turn to the words of Wendell Berry who says that we must do what is necessary (and my term is to curtail deeply) not because we can have a hope of success but rather so that we can maintain the values that make us human.
Thank you Mario, my friend, for the reminder,
Filed Under Community | Comments Off
Lifelong friend of Arthur Morgan, K. Viswanathan, better known as “Viswan,” died on April 28, 2014 at the age of 86.
His relationship with Arthur Morgan began in the early ’50’s when Viswan lived with Arthur and Lucy Morgan at their home in Yellow Springs, Ohio. Viswan identified three major influences in his life, Gandhi, Tagore, and Arthur Morgan. He and Morgan developed a close kinship during this time, which lasted until Morgan’s death in 1975.
Viswan is best known as the founder of Mitraniketan (1956), an educational and community development project in rural Kerala, South India. A follower of Gandhi, Viswan devoted his life to improving the quality of life through education and grass roots development in rural India.
In a period when educated Indians were generally leaving rural villages and migrating to the cities of India, Viswan chose to return to India and his rural home village of Vellanad. There he engaged in what became his lifelong work. Viswan’s family were farmers and his father was also a building contractor and his maternal grandfather an Ayurvedic physician. Viswan was intimately acquainted with the flora and fauna of the area.
Mitraniketan was a host to thousands of international visitors for whom it was a view into rural Indian life and an experience in a lifestyle with a very light environmental footprint. A number of Viswan’s ventures were supported by friends in Denmark, Japan, Holland, Germany and the U.S. attesting to his international outreach and connections.
As Louise Nielsen, a visitor from Denmark recounts, “while sipping a cup of black tea and eating a biscuit in his house, he said, “I have come to the end of my travels, but I am in touch with the world through all the people that visit us.” She writes:
“Sri Viswanathan is sitting comfortably in his usual chair in the small common area of his modest house. Here in 1956 in his native village Vellanad he founded the NGO Mitraniketan, which has been going strong ever since. It’s quiet. The monsoon rain stopped a while ago. Now only the music of crickets and the squeaking of squirrels occasionally fill the room. Next to his chair is the door to the rest of the house where he, his wife Sethu, their daughter and granddaughter live. Above the door frame hangs a wooden sign that says Peace with a dove on each side.
After graduating from Viswabharati University in Calcutta in 1953, Viswan obtained scholarships to study Educational Development in the USA, UK and Denmark. As a member of the low-ranked Ezhava caste himself, his desire was to understand why people from lower castes would not attend school, even where they had the opportunity. This is no longer an issue today in Kerala as school attendance has become the norm, but the focus of Mitraniketan remains on the empowerment and development of poor rural communities. As well as running a successful elementary and high school and a vocational college, they carry out various adult education projects to improve living and working conditions and maintain strong communities. For example, seminars are held on the use of local products such as rubber, coconut fibre and tapioca (lovingly referred to as the common man’s food), so that locals are able to start up small businesses in Kerala, rather than seeking employment outside of the region.
Commitment to the local community is indeed a key aspect for the people working at Mitraniketan. Following complaints made by children about problems in their families, a project was launched a year ago to help fight alcoholism in tribal areas. In co-operation with a local Ashram in Vellanad, Viswan and his employees made home visits and conducted meetings in the tribal areas to begin rehabilitation for fathers fighting alcoholism. As a result, several have returned sober to their villages, ready to take up a life without alcohol. Without community there can be no life; man is not an isolated animal and he never should be. Small communities and teamwork are essential, in fact they are the only hope for humanity, is what Viswan believes.
Hand to mouth existence
Mitraniketan is a non-aided charity, meaning that they receive no financial support from the government as they wish to remain independent. “We are ready to associate with the government but not to let them interfere with our work or control us,” he explains to me. Thus Mitraniketan relies solely on permanent donations from private individuals and organisations. The largest financial support currently comes from organisations in the USA, Denmark and Germany. As with many other charities, lack of funds remains a constant challenge for Mitraniketan and Viswan is not fully satisfied with their current situation. As the charity cannot afford to maintain the teachers, they are often hired on a temporary basis which results in inconsistency in the pupils’ education.
The children who are admitted to the school mainly come from tribal settlements near Vellanad or from the area of Wayanad some 300 km away. Most of the children are from the tribal or scheduled caste, which is considered to be the lowest in India. They live at Mitraniketan from the age of 5 and onwards, meaning that they are only able to see their families for summer holidays and a few festivals, as the parents do not have the means to come and visit. A mere €190 (€15.80/month) covers food, accommodation, clothing, personal needs, study materials and healthcare for one child for one year. This is covered by sponsorship that Mitraniketan receives from external donors. 215 children currently attend the school and another 100 are on a waiting list to get in.
I wish I could do more
Since he founded Mitraniketan in 1956, Viswan has been blessed with support and help from his family and friends. Originally, many expected him to land a lucrative job in management and even thought him a “mad fellow” for choosing a humble life devoted to helping others. He never expected that his wife would get used to isolated rural life as she was born and raised in the urban surroundings of Trivandrum, but she quit her job as a government servant and joined his mission.
She became the school’s headmistress, and to this day Mitraniketan remains a family “business” with most of his children and in-laws being involved in the work here, and for that Viswanathan is eternally grateful.
As I sit with him and listen to his story, I am reminded again and again that I am in the presence of someone extraordinary. That Viswan’s belief in the power of community and in the importance of fellowship has led him to devote his entire life to helping other people. He speaks of all people, whether they are friends or strangers, with such fondness and gratitude that it becomes very clear to me what he sees as the most important aspect of life: friendship. My friends are my assets, I love friendships more than anything in my life, he tells me, and it is through my friendships that I have become what I am today. That is why he named this place Mitraniketan, “the abode of friends.” And as a volunteer here you definitely feel at home, thanks to the warm atmosphere that his kind and personable manner has created. There is one biscuit left and as I offer it to him, he gives me a mischievous smile as if to say that this is our secret, as we both know he shouldn’t take it because of his diabetes. This perfectly captures how although he has achieved so much selfless work in his life, he is also just an approachable man with a sweet tooth.”
Viswan’s roots were in rural India but his views transcended caste, class, religion, language, nationality, gender, and age. Viswan and Mitraniketan were awarded many forms of recognition and hosted many illustrious visitors from the Vice President of India to the Dali Lama.
Viswan is survived by his wife, Sethu, three daughters, and two sons-in-law. His daughters Asha and Beena and son-in-law Reghu Rama Das, have been critical to the current operation of Mitraniketan and carry on his vision today.
Memorial contributions may be sent to Community Solutions; please earmark them for Mitraniketan.
Using the Internet, Questioning the Internet: Multigenerational Perspectives on Community, Authenticity, and Cyberspace
Filed Under Community | Comments Off
By Susan Jennings
First appeared in Communities Magazine December edition.
The Arthur Morgan Institute for Community Solutions in Yellow Springs, Ohio was founded 74 years ago as Community Service Inc; in 1940 it began the organization that eventually became the Fellowship for Intentional Community. For the last 10 years, Community Solutions’ main focus has been to educate people about the necessity to reduce their fossil fuel energy use and CO2 emissions as a way to mitigate the climate crisis. Much of our research has been on the false technological solutions touted by government and industry, including quantitative critiques of the LEED building system and the electric car.
So the vexing questions of community vs. technology are embedded in our personal and work interests, habits, and output. While all of us working at Community Solutions have been television-less for years, we routinely use the internet to communicate, to source information, and to post our research and writing. We work with the local community on energy projects, but still spend a large part of our time on the internet, oftentimes in conversation among colleagues through blogs and Twitter posts, or learning through alternative news sources. Indeed, it’s difficult to imagine a 21st century organization doing without the internet.
We remember what life was like before the web, using card catalogs to find information in libraries and relying on magazines, newspapers, and broadcast news for current analysis. Now there’s an almost miraculous amount of information about the planet available instantaneously. It’s hard to overestimate the importance the web plays in the spread of information in a time of rapid environmental, political, and economic changes. Photos and commentary about the damage wrought by climate change and the quest for fossil fuels – including the damage from fracking, tar sands, and mountaintop removal – is visible on your desktop if you are tuned in to the right sites. Citizen journalists with smart phones offer an immediate alternative view of current events – and sometimes the only view. The seeker of historical truth can go down rabbit holes of information, unearthing ideas and facts that might have been hidden at another time.
But by its very nature, information technology is a masterful tool of ideological control and manipulation. In the past decades it’s been at the forefront of the globalization of culture.
Even a brief survey of recent articles about the internet should give the most avid user pause. From the health impacts of wifi, to copyright and speed issues, to the consolidation of media providers and the ecological impact of information technology, battles over the use and control of the web seem to be just beginning.
How can we navigate these dichotomies? Pat Murphy, 75, our Research Director and author of several books, including Plan C: Community Survival Strategies for Peak Oil and Climate Change, uses the internet for some of his research. His work involves the accretion of detail and analysis of data – looking at longitudinal trends, especially on the kinds of technologies that have been proposed to deal with energy depletion and climate change. Over the last several years he’s followed the hopeful predictions surrounding technologies like biofuels, carbon capture and storage, and the electric car – seeing them peak and then stall. He’s also watched the predictions about climate change and how the reality has progressed much more quickly than scientists feared.
Pat says: “None of the stuff about climate is easy to learn. If you’re trying to find something on the internet, it takes a long time to find what you want and you have to look at the options and decide what’s useful to you. Like with any field, you have to separate the wheat from the chaff and that just comes from hard work. There are billions of documents on the internet and there’s no way that a person could ever go through all the urls to judge the quality. So it’s very important to develop qualified sources.”
Pat has learned to trust some of the data that government sites like the Department of Energy and The Environmental Protection Agency produce and post, but still finds he needs to do his own analysis on the data. He’s seen writers and researchers with agendas who will cherry pick data to show that, for example, solar power or the electric car are going to save us. He also turns to books. “Most of the philosophy or higher perspective on the situation I learn from books. Books are less susceptible to corporate manipulation and control than the internet. They have better quality control, a longer life, and a much higher density of information than magazines or electronic communication. Books are associated with communities of writers, printers, proofreaders, and a host of other people. A good book comes from this kind of human interaction between qualified people.”
Besides using the internet for research, we also use social media for communication and for getting the word out on issues that concern us, even though most of us don’t use it in our personal lives.
Faith Morgan, 65, Media Director, says: “If I weren’t in the organization I wouldn’t be using Facebook or Twitter and I probably wouldn’t be on the internet. I have lots of interests – painting and gardening and interacting with people, folkdancing, reading, building brick ovens – I have so much that I want to do that I would feel it’s a waste of time using the internet unless there is something specific I want to do such as research for my next film.”
That leaves it to Julia, 21, a junior at neighboring Antioch College and an intern at Community Solutions, to help us with Facebook and Twitter. Julia reads articles and blogs about energy and climate change and abstracts them into paragraphs and sentences for posting. Julia uses the internet for many more activities than the rest of us do.
Julia says: “As a student, I end up in front of a computer for 50-60 hours per week. We need computers for class, homework, and communication with friends and family. It adds up. On top of that – I grew up with the computer. From an early age, I have become accustomed to using it for entertainment, communication, and education. I might go online to research for a project, but I often get distracted – by interesting articles, pictures, conversations on Facebook, pins on Pinterest, facts about other places in the world, house prices in towns I may live in one day, how beehives are built in India, or even researching the ingredients in vegan marshmallows. It is wonderful to have so much information at your fingertips, but at the same time it can be easy to spend too much time on the internet.
“The urge to get on the computer at any boring moment is inevitable. Just check your Facebook real quick! Someone may have messaged you. Go look on Pinterest, you might get an inspiration for this paper you’re writing. Whenever I sit at a computer, I have access to a source of personal communication, silly videos, endless information, creative photos, crafty DIY ideas, vegan cupcake recipes – endless entertainment. Sometimes I literally have to turn off my internet access in order to focus when I’m working on homework. As well, I grew up with the internet. It’s difficult to imagine how I would get along without it. It is my friend when I feel alone, bored, sad, and distracted. Indeed, I cannot remember a time in my life when the internet was not somehow accessible, except in some of my travels.”
It’s precisely the amount of material on the screen that is disturbing to Pat: “A move from the original scientific orientation to an advertising orientation is one way the internet has deteriorated. For example, some of the Department of Energy sites are using more of a merchandising approach, using too many graphics – their site is more like an advertising vehicle and it makes it harder to get the information. There’s an overlay of social media that gets in my way.”
Nowhere is the phrase The Medium Is The Message more true than about the internet. The way that information is presented to the viewer can skew their sense of history, and their sense of the relevance of what they are reading. If you weren’t aware of the immensity of the issues facing mankind, you could spend days clicking through sites without recognizing the realities of climate change. You can get millions of hits on certain topics and still not have any insight into them; it’s a reminder that information is not knowledge and knowledge is not wisdom. The web is also all-encompassing and multisensory—huge parts of our population suffer attention deficit. People who imbibe media regularly also tend to be more fearful. News and compassion fatigue can lead to a sense of helplessness—there are so many wolves (or terrorists) that readers are unable to discern the real dangers of climate crisis or the fact that they can contribute to its mitigation.
Some of these issues arise from the nature of the medium, but there’s a sense that much disinformation is by design rather than by default, a view that has been confirmed a thousandfold over the last few years of revelations from Edward Snowden and others. Twitter feeds designed to take down the Cuban government; Wikipedia articles written or edited to reflect a government’s desired view; and studies by Facebook and others trying to manipulate their users’ emotions seem to be the tip of an iceberg many of us who depend on the internet don’t want to acknowledge. Yet we’ve seen information that was previously posted made more difficult to find, or simply disappear. The recent passage of the Right-to-be-Forgotten law means that the revisionist history that’s practiced could make the web more Orwellian still.
Faith says: “So much can be made up and posted on the internet. The ability to perpetuate propaganda on people has been intensified. Hold back the facts and send out the propaganda.”
Pat adds: “You have to remember that technology is really the province of corporations, particularly mass technology that deals with selling products. We are inundated with a level of advertising that is 10 times that of other countries.”
Snowden’s revelations remind us that whenever we are connected electronically, others can also connect to us. We’ve also read of people getting arrested or losing jobs over supposedly private communications via email or social media.
Pat says: “The year-old Snowden Affair may be the death blow for the dream. We are also becoming more aware of ubiquitous surveillance cameras, GPS in our phones, and the ability to track our cars. Smart meters, smart smoke alarms, smart thermostats, and smart appliances extend this concept into the home. Car, cell phone, home, and office are now set up for continuous surveillance by governments and giant corporations who provide the technology. Snowden exposed the collusion of internet suppliers.
“It was a great shock to find out that this was done without the consent of the people. It increased my disillusionment with my government. I thought that they were protecting me but it’s not true. Gathering up this data is a step toward a totalitarian state.”
Have the revelations changed his behavior on the web? “First I understand that everything I search on the internet and everything I say or write through electronic means is recorded. If I want to read anything on Cuba I assume I’m flagged as a suspect but I’m not going to stop searching in hopes that I won’t be noticed. Every social activist needs to know now that it will be easy to be picked up; they won’t have to search your house. The internet may be the most totalitarian device ever invented as we can be monitored so easily.”
It’s a concern shared by most of us, but within our families and workplace, there is a generational difference to the concern.
Julia, our intern, says: “The Snowden revelations don’t bother me, although they probably should. I remember in third grade learning that if I say certain words, the government would be able to track my conversations. However, I have never known anyone personally to be affected by that, so it’s hard for me to imagine that the government is really reading everyone’s emails and listening to everyone’s phone calls. Perhaps I wrote it off because it just did not feel real to me. It is still a disconcerting thought, and I hope our tax dollars aren’t used for things like that.”
Our ecological concerns make internet use even more complex. In his essay “Why I Am Not Going to Buy a Computer,” Wendell Berry noted that he’d “hate to think that my work as a writer could not be done without a direct dependence on strip-mined coal.” Pat adds, “the answer to a lot of this is to really understand that what appears to be benevolent technology has multiple downsides to it and we’re now seeing that other great benevolent technologies like air conditioning are heating up the planet. All technology has a price to it that can be measured in climate impacts.”
So is it time to turn off computer screens the same way we turned off our televisions? It’s clear that we need to have boundaries around their use. We recognize that internet research needs to be tempered with other forms of communication with each other and with the world around us. But we also recognize our own role in contributing to the body of knowledge that others can access from the web.
Not only older people but younger ones seem to be pulling away from information technology, and specifically the internet. Although Julia notes that she’s heard students say things like “My computer is my life,” and “I would die without access to the internet,” one third of Antioch students are not on Facebook and are otherwise moving away from the internet.
Julia says: “When I survey the amount of time I spend doing meaningless, distracting things on Facebook – as much as I love those random Buzzfeed quizzes – I am embarrassed because that time could have been spent reading a good book, meditating, walking in the woods, volunteering on the farm, finally starting a craft project I’ve been wanting to do, having a nice conversation with a friend, or even napping.
“In many ways I feel the internet greatly impedes me. For one, the internet is a safety net for entertainment and boredom – I am almost never forced to find creative ways to entertain myself. Further, it encourages a constant work day. I feel there is a cultural expectation to always be accessible and able to work. There is an expectation that you will see an email and respond to it promptly and that you will be able to do your homework by tomorrow even if it was assigned that evening. At one time, people were done with their work because the sun set. Now, we can work until the break of dawn if we need to. That capability coupled with my own procrastination results in just that. I have lost balance with the natural rhythms of nature. As I begin to look critically at our society and culture, I’m seeing our inherent separation from nature and the terrible things that have resulted.”
Faith says: “I don’t get on my computer on the weekend unless if have to. If I have a big project I will be on it researching, I get really involved, otherwise I turn it off on Friday and not back on until Monday. This is disconcerting for people, that they can’t reach me by the internet.”
Pat adds: “If we think we can substitute face-to-face with tweets, I don’t think so. The feedback mechanisms are quite different. It’s not good for your mind, like eating bad candy, to take in so much information. People are not changed for the better. Nor can you do any contemplation or deep thinking. Face-to-face opportunities stimulate memories of the environment. There’s a great deal of communication in tone, body language, and very powerful conversation.”
In fact, it is in community and away from our screens that we often rediscover balance. In our own work community we bounce ideas and information off one another and often come to a more nuanced sense of the truth than we can come to individually. We have also found that, when in other communities where we can’t have immediate access to technology, we learn unexpected things.
Faith says: “Last year I was at Twin Oaks, an intentional community of about 100 people. They did not have internet access in every building and you had to be at a land line phone location to use your cell phone. I asked about the restriction. They said that they didn’t want their everyday life to be interrupted by phones ringing everywhere and anywhere. It was a little frustrating and very refreshing.”
Julia says: “Every time I’m away from technology I feel my identity is fuller. Spending time with people, being outdoors, meditating, praying, or making something with my hands all give me so much more life than time on the computer can. My greatest moments of creativity, connection with others, and peace are away from the computer. Yet it is still hard to break away from at times. It can be an easy source of familiarity and comfort, especially in unfamiliar or uncomfortable moments.”
In trips to Costa Rica and Cuba, Julia and other travelers had their internet usage curtailed. “In that specific scenario I was at times uncomfortable, not having access to the familiarity of the computer which could easily connect me to my family and friends – but not having it was so very beneficial in the development of our immediate community. We had more conversations, shared more freely with each other, and relied on each other more for comfort and strength in difficult times.”
Faith was shocked by the discrepancy between her meeting Cubans face-to-face and a mainstream media-driven sense of reality. In her travels to Cuba, she found that her expectations of a poor uneducated populace were totally overturned when she had conversations with farmers and others whose literacy, sophistication, and openness made her realize: “They’re just like us.” Her admiration for what the Cubans endured after the fall of the Soviet Union and the United States embargo contrasted with the way Cuba was talked about by George Bush Jr. as part of the “Axis of Evil.” Faith says: “The reason I did The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil was because I thought that what Cubans faced and came through was very important for the world to know about.” The Power of Community has been seen by hundreds of thousands of people in film screenings across the planet and also on the web. Faith is currently working on a sequel about Cuba’s Energy Revolution, called Earth Island, Energy and Community.
Like our film work, our critiques about the futility of finding a techno-fix to solve the planet’s climate crisis also are posted on the internet. We are committed to contributing wherever we can to a holistic and fact-based view of the planet and the issues we face as a global people. Just like the alternate news sites that inform and sustain us, we feel it’s important to be part of a dialogue about the human future. Abandoning the web to corporate giants is like abandoning agriculture to GMOs.
At the same time, we continue to question the ubiquity of the web and whether its use by others for power and control outweigh its benefits. As our built infrastructure vices preference to the family car over walking or bicycling or taking trains, so the information superhighway can take us away from books and conversations and storytelling. We know we need to keep other kinds of conversations and communities and knowledgebases alive. We need to make sure we continue to tell stories of the way things are and the way things have been so that the only stories that are told are not through the corporate media’s eyes.
Filed Under Community | Comments Off
by Faith Morgan
Yellow Springs, in southwest Ohio, is not in direct danger from shale gas extraction, aka “fracking” for natural gas; we don’t have the geology for it. It’s another story in eastern Ohio, across the Ohio River from Pennsylvania and Virginia, where there is oil, coal, and natural gas. The early strip mines left bare “high walls” on the Ohio hills. Then giant earth-moving equipment was brought in, such as the GEM (Giant Earth Mover) of Egypt, which moved whole hills aside to get the coal beneath. By then reclamation was required, but 30 or more years later the treeless reclaimed land, with rubble-strewn soil, is still in evidence. When the coal seam went too deep for stripping, south of Interstate 70, long-wall coal mining began. It’s a form of mining that takes place hundreds of feet below the earth’s surface, removing square kilometers of coal at a pass, causing subsidence at the surface. Natural gas fracking came next, moving from Pennsylvania and West Virginia to Ohio.
My brother, John Morgan, lives in eastern Ohio, so I have heard about shale gas developments. Last week, Eric Johnson and I took our video camera to begin documenting what is taking place around Barnesville, Ohio. It was a trip of great contrasts. We stayed in a community with people who had purchased a large tract of land 44 years ago to protect it from strip mining, and who have not sold their fracking rights for natural gas. We attended a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hearing in Cadiz, Ohio, concerning the 42-inch Rover pipeline that will transport natural gas from the tri-state region of Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia to Canada.
The next day we visited two families who have built or are building earth covered super-insulated solar homes. They are using PV panels and wind turbines for electricity. John then took us on a tour of fracking sites. We saw well pads that took up six acres of land and compressor stations used to clean the gas as it comes out of the ground and pressurize it for pipeline transport. There were also monstrous water storage tanks being filled with water from creeks for fracking use, settling ponds, and wastewater injection wells. We visited the area’s drinking water reservoir to witness the drawdown resulting from selling water from it for fracking. That evening we attended a “Concerned Barnesville Area Residents” (CBAR) meeting. The group organized when it was learned that the first of 23 unregulated Ohio shale gas-related waste facilities was being sited next to Barnesville. This was to dispose of drill cuttings, which we learned commonly contain dangerous levels of radioactivity from black shale formations. Pennsylvania landfills are rejecting these radioactive drill cuttings, so it is being sent to Ohio, along with 80 percent of Pennsylvania’s fracking flowback, which is also coming to Ohio for disposal.
After stopping the dump site, CBAR turned their attention to protecting the Barnesville reservoirs, water source for over 12,000 area residents. Two shale well pads are planned to be located close to the largest reservoir. The village is working on a water protection plan, but whether it will be able to assure the safety of the water supply is uncertain. Some in the group have turned their attention to researching ways to monitor air pollution from shale gas operations as well. It appears that, to date, Ohio is doing minimal air monitoring for possible contamination in the shale region. Eric and I interviewed a couple who had sold their fracking rights and a young woman who had not.
To continue our trip’s contrast, the next day we drove to Zanesville, Ohio where we visited Zane State College’s impressive alternative energy program and the Quasar biodigester. The Quasar facility takes animal and human waste, as well as milk and other produce that can no longer be sold, and extracts the energy (methane gas) before the waste is returned to the soil as both liquid and dry compost. Quasar uses the gas to generate electric power that heats or cools and runs the facility. There is also enough left to make into compressed natural gas (CNG) to fuel their trucks and cars. We were told that if the gas is not used in these ways, it would have to be “flared” off.
The trip showed us both positive and negative things that are happening. On one side were super-efficient buildings with greatly reduced energy demand; the use of solar hot-water heating, wind turbines, and solar PV; and capturing methane gas from waste products rather than put it into landfills. Juxtaposed to this was fracking for natural gas, the water pollution from which could end up being as devastating for this area of deep stone ravines, woodlands, and farms as mountaintop-removal coal mining is to southern West Virginia and eastern Kentucky. Fracking pads are large and, to access the “inventory” of gas, must be laid out in a grid across the landscape; they can be as close together as 1/3- to 1/2-mile apart.
I came away from this trip troubled. On one hand I can imagine what this area might look like when the gas is gone, how polluted it might become, and how people’s lives and occupations could be disrupted, which makes me want to stop the fracking. On the other hand I am dependent on natural gas to keep me warm in winter and to cook my food. I am also aware that the drop in U.S. CO2 emissions is because we have converted some of our electric power generation to natural gas from coal. The night after our tour of fracking sites I was very troubled, I wrote in my journal, “I am the problem; I depend on natural gas for my needs.”
keep looking »