![]() |
|
![]()
Click on any question for the answer: Q: What is Peak Oil? Q: Why should I be concerned about Peak Oil? Q: Will this just mean higher prices at the pump? Think about the implications of a higher price at the pump. Factor in that the average distance food travels in the U.S. from where it is made to where it is consumed is 1,200 miles. When it costs more for fuel, it will cost more to move food. When it costs more to move food, food prices will go up. Also, when it costs more for fuel, it will cost more to operate tractors, combines and other farm machinery. If it costs more to operate farm equipment, the price of food will go up. Furthermore, if it costs more to manufacture widgets because it is more expensive to deliver the raw materials to the factory, the price of widgets will go up and people will buy fewer widgets. The widget factories won't be able to justify having as many workers and will let many go. People will have lost their jobs at a time when food is more expensive than ever. This is only scratching the surface of possible implications. Peak Oil will affect every aspect of global industrial society that uses energy directly or indirectly. The price of gasoline is one small part of the picture. Q: Does the arrival of Peak Oil mean we are running out of oil? Q: If half of the oil that ever existed is still in the ground, and demand for oil is rising now, why can't we keep increasing oil extraction? Oil reservoirs are not like tanks that can be easily emptied. They are more like sponges. (Picture using a straw to extract all the water from a sponge!) Extracting oil depends on pressure inside the reservoir to force the oil out. This works well enough when the reservoir is first tapped, but as pressure decreases, the pressure needs to be maintained. Sometimes this is done by injecting seawater or carbon dioxide. However, forcing the oil too much can damage a reservoir and reduce the overall amount that can be extracted. One can never extract all the oil from a reservoir (or water from a sponge by using a straw). There always comes a point when more effort is put into extracting the oil than is economically justifiable. Here's another way to think about it: Oil production is subject to the law of diminishing returns. Initial efforts yield a lot of oil easily, but later efforts become more and more inefficient (you get less output for your effort), until the point arrives when it's not worth putting more effort into it. Harvesting a jar of peanut butter is also subject to the law of diminishing returns. It's easy to get it out at first, but as you dig deeper you don't get as much peanut butter with each spoonful. There comes a point when you're putting in a lot of effort scraping peanut butter off the sides of the jar and getting very little for your trouble. At some point you discard the jar, even though there may be a spoonful or two left. Q: When will Peak Oil occur? Q: What will the history of oil extraction look like? Q: Why is oil production described by a bell curve and a peak? Why isn't it linear or some other shape? After a point in the mid-1960s, oil discoveries started slowing down. (The year 1964 was a peak – not in production, but in discovery.) This wasn't because people stopped looking, but because the oil that was left was harder to find – even with the use of advanced technology. All of the largest, easiest-to-exploit oil fields had already been discovered. Every year we discover less than the year before. Since discoveries came to a maximum point and have dwindled and we have been actively harvesting those discoveries, oil production must also come to a maximum point and dwindle. Because we can still squeeze more oil out of existing reservoirs, and we do still discover tiny additional reservoirs, oil production will not fall off a cliff and stop all of a sudden. It will gradually slow down when the easier-to-get oil has been extracted and the smaller oil fields and the harder-to-get oil become the supplies we are exploiting. Q: Aren't we discovering more oil all the time? Think of the oil we have discovered as a savings account, or better yet, an inheritance, but we're not earning any interest on it (the amount of oil that is actually in the reservoirs does not increase). We have a certain amount of money (oil) available to use, say $100,000. We spend $5,000 per month, and earn $1,000 per month (new discoveries add more oil to our "account"). This obviously can't go on forever. We have a net deficit of $4,000 per month. At this rate, the $100,000 will only last for 25 months. We have another problem, however. Were not using the money (oil) at a constant rate. As the population grows and people try to emulate the lifestyle of the United States, the demand for oil is increasing rather than staying constant. Q: What is the difference between extraction and production? Q: What are some of the consequences of Peak Oil? As long distance transportation for food and other important goods becomes too expensive and energy intensive with declining oil supplies, local communities will have to become more self-reliant and self-sustaining. In effect, the process of globalization will reverse as a massive economic re-localization effort begins out of necessity. Peak Oil will call into question our growth-based economic system. Thus the rising standards of living to which we have become accustomed may actually begin to decline after the peak. At the same time we believe that our quality the life may actually rise as people become more interdependent and cooperative within their local communities. Q: What will happen as Peak Oil occurs? Q: What will happen after Peak Oil occurs? Because oil is used to transport the goods of our consumer society from all over the nation and globe, the price of most products will also go up. Food prices will be the most evident as food spending as a percentage of income rises. Furthermore, because energy prices and the economy are so closely linked, an economic recession will be the most likely consequence. Rising national and consumer debt, increased unemployment, and increased social unrest will all follow. As we acclimate ourselves to a world of scarce oil, the use of oil for non-essential purposes will decrease dramatically. Miles driven will decrease and people will drive more fuel efficient vehicles. People will use less oil directly and indirectly because they cannot afford it. Living in a suburb will become more difficult since cars won't be able to be used as much to get around. Families will likely spend more time with each other. There will be an increasing interest in organic farming out of necessity as food prices continue to escalate. Oil production will decrease steadily each year until it is all gone in about 40 years. There will still be oil left but it will be too costly to get it out– that is, it may take more energy to get it out than it contains. The oil interval in human history will be over. Q: We have enough oil to last 40 or 50 years. What's the problem? Also keep in mind that even if oil production could be maintained at current levels for 40-50 years, that is not a long time to come up with alternative arrangements! Q: What is per capita oil production and what significance does it have? This leads to the observation that some populations, such as that of the United States, use more than their fair share of oil on a per capita basis. U.S. citizens use twenty times the oil of the average world citizen; Europeans use fifteen times the oil of the average world citizen. Q: What is "energy returned on energy invested" (EROEI)? People exploit the resources that are easiest to access first, and only exploit the resources that are hard to get at later on. Thus, as the age of cheap oil draws to a close, the remaining energy resources available to exploit are naturally the ones that are not as easy to access and use. Any substitution for oil will involve using a fuel of lower energy density and/or lesser convenience. Q: I heard that the U.S. has 200 years of coal left, so why can't we just replace the oil with coal? Since coal has less energy stored in the same amount of mass than oil, more coal (by weight) is needed than oil to provide the same amount of power. Indeed, the railroad industry moved away from coal-fired steam engines to diesel-electric locomotives because an engine that uses petroleum-based diesel fuel is inherently more efficient. Because the energy density of coal, roughly speaking, is about half that of oil, one would need coal weighing approximately twice as much as the equivalent amount of gasoline in order to power the car. That would be equivalent to about 12 pounds of coal for every one gallon of gasoline, which weighs about 6 pounds. And even then, while twice as much coal contains about the same amount of energy as gasoline, it does not burn as hot as gasoline does, so the equivalent amount of coal would not provide the equivalent horsepower to gasoline burned in a car's engine. Concerns continue to mount over the sulfur and carbon oxides that are released when coal is burned. These chemicals fall back to the earth as "acid rain" and accumulate in bodies of water often killing all plant and animal life. The acidification of lakes and rivers in the Northeastern U.S. from Midwestern coal plants is well-documented. Over the past decade a scientific consensus has developed on the issue of global climate change. Carbon dioxide released from coal plants is a major contributor to the accumulation of "greenhouse gases" in the atmosphere. These gases trap additional heat that usually escapes from the earth. An overall heating trend can cause erratic temperature changes and extreme weather events. Q: What about hydrogen? Think of hydrogen like electricity. You cannot mine electricity from the ground – you have to create it. To create it, you have to convert a source of energy into electricity. Oil, natural gas, solar radiation, and coal are examples of energy sources. They can be mined or collected and used directly. Electricity, hydrogen, and disposable batteries are examples of energy carriers. They cannot be mined. They have to be created by using energy sources. Whenever energy is converted from a source to a carrier, energy is lost. (This phenomenon is described by the second law of thermodynamics.) This means that more energy goes into making electricity than is delivered on the other end of the transmission line. More energy goes into making batteries than is collected from the battery. The same is true of hydrogen. It is always more efficient to use oil, natural gas, solar radiation, or coal directly than to turn it into electricity. But it is not always more convenient or useful. Most hydrogen produced today is made by stripping the hydrogen from natural gas molecules (they have one carbon atom and four hydrogen atoms) in a process called steam reformation. High temperature steam reacts with the natural gas in the presence of a catalyst. In addition to supplying the hydrogen, natural gas is often burned in order to create the high temperature steam. Increasing use of natural gas at a time when natural gas demand is increasing and natural gas is on its way to peaking just like oil is foolhardy. Because of its limitations, hydrogen cannot live up to the high hopes politicians hold for it. Talking about the "hydrogen economy" will keep people from dealing with the real issues. The boom associated with oil and natural gas will soon be over. Q: What about using ethanol made from corn as a substitute for gasoline? Q: We'll simply develop alternative sources of energy to keep the economy going. This won't be so difficult, will it? Alternative sources of energy are often used to make electricity, and the energy density of batteries to store the energy does not compare with the energy density of oil. (Batteries provide hundreds of watt-hours per kilogram at best compared to 13,500 Wh/kg for gasoline.) This means that it will take more weight in batteries to do the same work as a certain amount of oil. Alternatives can provide energy, but not in the amount it takes to satisfy the growing consumption of global industrial society. This means that it will be impossible to maintain the same level of energy use we currently have. Q: How will we know when we've arrived at the peak? Q: Surely we'll find a technological fix to get ourselves out of this bind, don't you think? Q: Where can I find more information on Peak Oil? |
Talks &
Presentations |